Skip to main content

Summers v. State

Citations

  • 831 A.2d 1134
  • 152 Md. App. 362
  • 2003 Md. App. LEXIS 114
  • 2003 WL 22075685

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an improper discussion between two jurors outside the presence of the rest of the jury results in a “greatly diminished” concern of a tainted verdict when compared to contact between a juror and a third party
  • noting that an improper discussion between two jurors outside the presence of the rest of the jury results in a “greatly diminished” concern of a tainted verdict when compared to contact between a juror and a third party
  • “When the trial judge is able to voir dire a juror about the improper contact and assess how it may affect the juror’s prospective ability to deliberate or to render a fair verdict, the presumption of prejudice may not be warranted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sonner, Adkins, Greene

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.