Summers v. Sjogren

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that prosecutor does not lose immunity merely because she was acting in a post-conviction setting
• finding that prosecutor “does not lose immunity merely because she was acting in a post-conviction setting”
• finding that prosecutor “does not lose immunity merely because she was acting in a post-conviction setting”
• a prosecutor who allegedly filed false documents in opposition to a habeas petition “does not lose immunity merely because she was acting in a post-conviction setting”
• a prosecutor who allegedly filed false documents 13 See U.S. Const. art. II, § 9, cl. 2 (“The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).