Summers, Frank v. Howard University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering appeal brought by plaintiffs whose 60(b)(3) motion for relief from judgment of a magistrate judge was denied by the judge
• noting “[f]ailure to disclose or produce materials requested in discovery can constitute ‘misconduct’ within the purview of” Rule 60(b)(3), but not discussing whether such misconduct could be the basis of fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).