Summerlin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim that a defendant was improperly sentenced by a successor judge without a showing of necessity is a sentencing error that must be preserved by objection at sentencing or by a rule 3.800(b) motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-30· cited 10×
• Harris v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-22· cited 4×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anders v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
• Hakkenberg v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-17· cited 9×
• Snyder v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-01-07· cited 8×
• Bell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-24· cited 3×