Summer Kazzee v. Arkansas Department of Human Services and Minor Child

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming lower court's reasoning that \[i]t is the overall physical appearance of defendant's trade dress which is critical\
• holding unclean hands did not preclude injunction because plaintiff’s alleged regulatory violations did “not implicate transgressions so egregious as to merit the preclusion of an injunction” against manufacturer of generic drug found to have violated trademark laws
• affirming lower court’s reasoning that “[i]t is the overall physical appearance of defendant’s trade dress which is critical”
• affirming the district court’s reasoning that “Realistically the likelihood of confusion cannot be assessed by a side-by-side comparison of the plaintiffs and defendant’s products” (quotation omitted)
• “[Defendant’s] capsules are identical to [plaintiff ’s] APRESAZIDE capsules except that each is imprinted with the name of its respective manufacturer.”
• where district court has correctly found that plaintiff has succeeded on the merits, court of appeals \must uphold the permanent injunction in its entirety so long as the balance of equities favors injunctive relief\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).