Sumitomo Trust & Banking Co. v. Holly's, Inc. (In Re Holly's, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plan may be “somewhat obscure or vague as long as it is plausible that a successful reorganization may occur.”
• “[T]he debtor’s plan can be somewhat obscure or vague as long as it is plausible that a successful reorganization may occur.”
• “After the expiration of the exclusivity period, the balance between the reasonableness of the delay borne by a secured creditor and the debtor’s ability to formulate a plan favors the creditor [and lifting the stay].”
• “A single writing may contain more than one contract for § 365 assumption-rejection purposes.”
• burden on debt- or under section 362(d)(2) less stringent early in Chapter 11 case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).