· 12/6/2000
Sume v. State
Citations
- 773 So. 2d 600
- 2000 WL 1780767
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding legal sufficiency of motion to disqualify is pure question of law subject to de novo review
- explaining that recusal is the process whereby a trial judge removes himself, whereas disqualification is the process by which a party seeks to remove a trial judge from the case
- “Recusal” is the process whereby judges remove themselves from cases where “disqualification” is the process by which a party seeks to have a judge removed.
- “Recusal” is the process whereby judges remove themselves from cases where “disqualification” is the process by which a party seeks to have a judge removed.
- “Recusal” is the process whereby judges remove themselves from cases where “disqualification” is the process by which a party seeks to have a judge removed.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Padovano
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.