Skip to main content
· 12/6/2000

Sume v. State

Citations

  • 773 So. 2d 600
  • 2000 WL 1780767

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding legal sufficiency of motion to disqualify is pure question of law subject to de novo review
  • explaining that recusal is the process whereby a trial judge removes himself, whereas disqualification is the process by which a party seeks to remove a trial judge from the case
  • “Recusal” is the process whereby judges remove themselves from cases where “disqualification” is the process by which a party seeks to have a judge removed.
  • “Recusal” is the process whereby judges remove themselves from cases where “disqualification” is the process by which a party seeks to have a judge removed.
  • “Recusal” is the process whereby judges remove themselves from cases where “disqualification” is the process by which a party seeks to have a judge removed.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Padovano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.