Sumakeris v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that negligent hiring claim may not violate First Amendment, but that complaint must plead the operative facts with particularity
• giving the example that a bar owner employing a bouncer may be vicariously liable to a patron if the bouncer injures the patron while removing him from the premises
• giving the example that a bar owner employing a bouncer may be vicariously liable to a patron if the bouncer injures the patron while removing him from the premises
• giving the example that a bar owner employing a bouncer may be vicariously liable to a patron if the bouncer injures the patron while removing him from the premises
• giving the example that a bar owner employing a bouncer may be vicariously liable to a patron if the bouncer injures the patron while removing him from the premises
• dismissing' negligent hiring claim against church after applying heightened pleading standard; requiring that operative facts be pled with particularity because of “the myriad [of] First Amendment problems” accompanying such claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).