Sulzberger & Sons Co. v. Olav

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “‘[A] double jeopardy claim [is] reviewed de novo.’ Syllabus Point 1, in part, State v. Sears, 196 W.Va. 71, 468 S.E.2d 324 (1996).”
• “ ‘[A] double jeopardy claim [is] reviewed de novo.’ Syllabus Point 1, in part, State v. Sears, 196 W.Va. 71, 468 S.E.2d 324 (1996).” (alterations in original)
• in case involving multiple charges of malicious assault, “the legislature intended for each ‘wound’ or ‘bodily injury’ motivated by an intent to ‘maim, disfigure, disable or kill’ to be the proper unit of prosecution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).