· 6/27/1916
Sulunias Banana Co. v. Fruit Dispatch Co.
Citations
- 18 Ga. App. 306
- 89 S.E. 376
- 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 314
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We agree with defendants that the affirmed report of the chiropractor is not in admissible form inasmuch as it was not sworn to before a notary or other authorized official.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Iodges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.