Skip to main content
· 6/27/1916

Sulunias Banana Co. v. Fruit Dispatch Co.

Citations

  • 18 Ga. App. 306
  • 89 S.E. 376
  • 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 314

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We agree with defendants that the affirmed report of the chiropractor is not in admissible form inasmuch as it was not sworn to before a notary or other authorized official.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Iodges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.