Sultan Chemists, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an EAB proceeding is a formal adjudication to which courts should defer under Mead if the statutory language is ambiguous
• holding that an EAB proceeding is a formal adjudication to which courts should defer under Mead if the statutory language is ambiguous
• “The EPA is charged with choosing the means by which to enforce and achieve the goals of FIFRA. In such a case, heightened deference is due to the agency’s penalty [calculation].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).