Sulman v. Sulman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that treatment for orthodontic problems “may be included as an extraordinary medical expense”
• bills for psychological counseling held to be medical' expenses
• “We do not disapprove of the trial court’s decision not to hold the former husband in contempt, since his challenge to the request to pay appears to have been in good faith and his behavior does not appear to constitute willful disobedience of a court order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).