Sullivan v. Warminster Township

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Courts generally hold that disclosures that occur outside the context of a judicial proceeding do not implicitly waive the privilege as to all communications on the same subject matter.”
• “[I]t is the communications and not the underlying facts that are privileged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Technetics Grp. Daytona, Inc. v. N2 Biomedical, LLC
  North Carolina Business Court· 2018-11-08

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Weintraub
  Supreme Court· 1985-04-29· cited 753×
• Burt N. Sempier v. Johnson & Higgins
  Third Circuit· 1995-02-14· cited 465×
• United States v. John Voigt
  Third Circuit· 1996-07-09· cited 454×
• Unnamed case
  First Circuit· 1994-08-17· cited 319×
• In Re Claus Von Bulow, Martha Von Bulow, by Her Next Friends Alexander Auersperg, and Annie Laurie Auersperg-Kneissl v. Claus Von Bulow
  Second Circuit· 1987-09-10· cited 300×
• In Re Teleglobe Communications Corp.
  Third Circuit· 2007-07-17· cited 285×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 2000-04-26· cited 175×
• Lynn Martin, Secretary of Labor v. Bally's Park Place Hotel & Casino and Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission
  Third Circuit· 1993-02-12· cited 89×
• Basinger v. Glacier Carriers, Inc.
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1985-10-22· cited 34×
• Denney v. Jenkens & Gilchrist
  S.D. New York· 2004-11-23· cited 31×
• Sampson v. School District of Lancaster
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-11-05· cited 12×