Skip to main content
· 11/30/1972

Sullivan v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 29 Cal. App. 3d 64
  • 105 Cal. Rptr. 241
  • 1972 Cal. App. LEXIS 675

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • preserving privilege in transcription of attorney- 22 client communication where the witness “refreshed her memory prior to the deposition and 23 raised the privilege when demand was made that she produce the transcription.”
  • attorney-client privilege applicable when client previously refreshes recollection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.