Sullivan v. Sullivan
Citations
- 52 Wash. 160
- 100 P. 321
- 1909 Wash. LEXIS 1091
Syllabus
<p>Divorce — Grounds-—Cruelty—What Constitutes — Evidence — Sufficiency. Personal violence is not necessary to constitute cruel treatment as a ground for divorce, and the evidence is sufficient to warrant a decree where it appears that the husband for seven years refused to speak to his wife or children except when absolutely necessary, made unjust charges of improper conduct, insulted and humiliated her guests, and made himself so disagreeable that the wife’s life was rendered miserable and the legitimate ends and objects of matrimony had ceased to exist.</p> <p>Same — Personal Indignities — Evidence—Sufficiency. The statutory ground of “personal indignities rendering life burdensome” authorizes a divorce, although the conduct does not fall within the accepted definition of cruel treatment.</p> <p>Same — Division of Proferty — Separate and Community Peop-' erty. In granting a divorce and dividing property which the parties have been accumulating for twenty-five years, its origin and the amount of rents and profits of separate estate during that time is immaterial, where a fair division is made.</p> <p>Same — Attorney’s Pees — Allowances—Appeal—Harmless Error. The allowance of an attorney’s fee of $2,500 in a divorce case where $200,000 worth of property was divided, is not excessive and is without prejudice where the court would doubtless have increased plaintiff’s allowance had the attorney’s fee not been granted; and although under Bal. Code, § 5165, attorney’s fees are to be left to private contract, where the parties have the means to employ them.</p> <p>Costs — On Appeal — Rents Pending Appeal. Where pending appeal’ a decree of divorce dividing the property is superseded, the rents and profits pending the appeal will, on affirmance, be offset against allowances made to the respondent, in view of which interest and costs may be disallowed by the supreme court on prompt payment of the judgment by appellant.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that “after a husband and wife have toiled on together for upwards of a quarter of a century in accumulating property, . . . the ultimate duty of the court is to make a fair and equitable division under all the circumstances”
- finding that for a marriage lasting over 25 years, \after [which] a husband and wife have toiled on together for upwards of a quarter of a century in accumulating property . . . the ultimate duty of the court is to make a fair and equitable division under all the circumstances\
- affirming trial court’s award of $92,500 to wife and $129,000 to husband
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rudkin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re the Marriage of RockwellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-08-27· cited 180×
- In Re Marriage of RockwellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-10-19· cited 146×
- In re the Marriage of: Ellen Doneen and James DoneenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2017-02-28· cited 24×
- Shufeldt v. HughesWashington Supreme Court· 1909-10-11· cited 12×
- Best v. BestWashington Supreme Court· 1956-01-26· cited 8×
- Willson v. WillsonWashington Supreme Court· 1915-03-01· cited 2×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.