District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/1/1990
Sullivan v. State
Citations
- 562 So. 2d 813
- 1990 WL 72516
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant’s sentence could not be enhanced where information did not contain statutory elements necessary for enhancement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Booth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mahaun v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-12-13· cited 92×
- Redondo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-07-23· cited 75×
- Streeter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-07-13· cited 47×
- Fletcher v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-06-27· cited 31×
- State v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-03-16· cited 28×
- Blackwelder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-10-04· cited 18×
- Peck v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-01-26· cited 13×
- Wooten v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-06-16· cited 11×
- Cox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-09-01· cited 8×
- State v. CrockerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-12-18· cited 7×
- Jennings v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-12-23· cited 6×
- Denmark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-05-17· cited 5×
- Buckbee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-02-20· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.