Skip to main content
· 5/9/1973

Sullivan v. O'CONNOR

Citations

  • 296 N.E.2d 183
  • 363 Mass. 579
  • 99 A.L.R. 3d 294
  • 1973 Mass. LEXIS 426

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the law requires clear proof of a contract to cure or to achieve a particular result
  • discussing various alternate measures of damages for breach of contract, including expectancy, restitutionary, and reliance bases
  • permitting contract actions based on express promises, but requiring “clear proof’
  • although mental anguish damages are not available for breach of a commercial contract, psychological injury may be contemplated in a contract for an operation
  • \[T]here is no general rule barring [emotional damages] in actions for breach of contract. It is all a question of the subject matter and background of the contract. . . .\
  • patient may sue doctor for breach of promise to produce a specific medical result

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tauro, Reardon, Quirico, Kaplan, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.