· 5/9/1973
Sullivan v. O'CONNOR
Citations
- 296 N.E.2d 183
- 363 Mass. 579
- 99 A.L.R. 3d 294
- 1973 Mass. LEXIS 426
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the law requires clear proof of a contract to cure or to achieve a particular result
- discussing various alternate measures of damages for breach of contract, including expectancy, restitutionary, and reliance bases
- permitting contract actions based on express promises, but requiring “clear proof’
- although mental anguish damages are not available for breach of a commercial contract, psychological injury may be contemplated in a contract for an operation
- \[T]here is no general rule barring [emotional damages] in actions for breach of contract. It is all a question of the subject matter and background of the contract. . . .\
- patient may sue doctor for breach of promise to produce a specific medical result
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tauro, Reardon, Quirico, Kaplan, Wilkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.