Sullivan v. Leor Energy, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that leave to amend was properly denied where plaintiff was on notice of deficiencies for nine months and did not attempt to correct them
• holding that leave to amend was properly denied where plaintiff was on notice of deficiencies for nine months and did not attempt to correct them
• stating that courts generally must not go outside the pleadings but may consider documents attached to the motion to dismiss that “are referred to in the plaintiff’s complaint and are central to the plaintiff’s claim”
• dismissing plaintiff's fraud claim after he failed to allege who at the defendant company made the fraudulent statements, or when or where they occurred
• dismissing state law fraud claims under Rule 9(b) standard for failure to “allege who at the company made the statements or when or where they occurred”
• explaining that Rule 9(b) applies to state-law fraud claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).