Sullivan v. L. & N. R. R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]his Court has previously declined to recognize a new type of Harless claim ... because the West Virginia Supreme Court has interpreted Harless so narrowly”
• stating that “[t]his Court has previously declined to recognize a new type of Harless claim . . . because the West Virginia Supreme Court has interpreted Harless so narrowly”
• “Section 218c of the FLSA prohibits retaliation by an employer against an employee who has assisted or participated in a proceeding” regarding an FLSA violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).