Sullivan v. HAWKER BEECHCRAFT CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the trial court properly denied the plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint because the plaintiff failed to cite any new factual allegations that would impact the issue
• stating that, in order to justify jurisdictional discovery, a plaintiff‘s claim must not be ―attenuated and based on bare allegations‖ and must offer more than ―speculation or conclusory assertions‖
• holding a Rule 15 motion is subject to abuse of discretion review
• “[T]he court need not permit even limited discovery confined to issues of personal jurisdiction if it will be a fishing expedition.”
• ―[T]he court need not permit even limited discovery confined to issues of personal jurisdiction if it will be a fishing expedition.‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).