Sullivan v. Fouts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he routine extension of a loan does not amount to substantial assistance” for purposes of aiding and abetting securities fraud
• bank’s extension of loans, taking of security interest and authorizing the use of bank documents did not constitute substan tial assistance to violators of securities laws

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).