Sullivan v. DEP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \`judicial adherence to the agency's view is not demanded when it is contrary to the statute's plain meaning'\
• acknowledging that judicial deference to an agency’s interpretation of a statute is not required where the reading is contrary to its plain language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).