Supreme Court of Minnesota· 4/19/1974
Sullivan v. Credit River Township
Citations
- 217 N.W.2d 502
- 299 Minn. 170
- 1974 Minn. LEXIS 1432
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that statute that “does not declare the consequences of a failure to comply may be construed as a directory statute” and failure to comply with statute does not necessarily invalidate actions taken pursuant to statute
- stating that when a statute fails to provide consequences for failure to comply it is directory rather than mandatory
- stating that when a statute fails to provide consequences for failure to comply it is directory rather than mandatory
- recognizing statute that does not state consequences of failure to comply is directory
- refusing to invalidate actions that were the result of a closed meeting because the law was directory, rather than mandatory
- statute that does not express consequences of failure to comply with its provisions is directory
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Knutson, Rogosheske, MacLaughlin, Yetka
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-08-11· cited 94×
- Ridgewood Development Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-05-30· cited 63×
- Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. v. City of MinnetristaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-03-15· cited 47×
- State v. NordquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-08-03· cited 45×
- Mesaba Aviation Division of Halvorson of Duluth, Inc. v. County of ItascaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-09-30· cited 44×
- St. Cloud Newspapers, Inc. v. District 742 Community SchoolsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-03-25· cited 42×
- Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of AftonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-27· cited 33×
- Nageotte v. Board of Supervisors of King George CountySupreme Court of Virginia· 1982-03-12· cited 29×
- Slawson v. Alabama Forestry Com'nSupreme Court of Alabama· 1994-01-14· cited 22×
- Demolition Landfill Services, LLC v. City of DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-04-25· cited 22×
- Application of Crown CoCo, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-07-10· cited 16×
- Manco of Fairmont, Inc. v. Town Board of Rock Dell TownshipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-08-25· cited 15×
- Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. BoyneSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-05-28· cited 13×
- State, City of Eden Prairie v. LiepkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-03-31· cited 13×
- Itasca County Board of Commissioners v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-08-20· cited 12×
- Wilmington Federation of Teachers v. HowellSupreme Court of Delaware· 1978-02-18· cited 9×
- Petition of D & a Truck Line, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-11-01· cited 8×
- Merz v. LeitchSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-01-13· cited 6×
- Savre v. Independent School District No. 283Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-04-17· cited 5×
- Lewis v. Town of NederlandColorado Court of Appeals· 1996-08-08· cited 4×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Adler v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1960-09-22· cited 55×
- In Re Petition for Removal of RiceAppellate Court of Illinois· 1962-03-12· cited 32×
- Gowanlock v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1954-02-24· cited 20×
- State ex rel. Ferro v. OellermannMissouri Court of Appeals· 1970-09-22· cited 8×
- Severson v. EngbarthSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-05-07· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.