Sullivan v. Bickel & Brewer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding appellant had waived points not supported by argument and authority
• concluding appellant had waived points not supported by argument and authority
• concluding appellant had waived points not supported by argument and authority
• holding appellate court has discretion to waive point due to inadequate briefing
• indicating a cause of action for legal malpractice arises out of an attorney’s bad legal advice or improper representation of a client
• concluding appellant had waived points not supported by argument and authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).