Sullivan v. Bach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the defendant’s attack on the default judgment “serve[d] only to submit [him] to the court’s jurisdiction as of the date he appeared”
• the defendant's attack on the default judgment \serve[d] only to submit [him] to the court's jurisdiction as of the date he appeared\
• “[A]n appearance subsequent to judgment may be construed as submission to the court’s jurisdiction for retroactive validation of a prior judgment where the defendant acts to accept the benefits of the judgment”
• \[A]n appearance subsequent to judgment may be construed as submission to the court's jurisdiction for retroactive validation of a prior judgment where the defendant acts to accept the benefits of the judgment\
• involving an ex parte judgment for $20,000
• involving an ex parte judgment for $20,000

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).