Sullivan v. Arcand

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that knowledge of contents of a stolen jacket was not necessary to sustain conviction of theft of credit card which was located within a wallet in one of the jacket pockets
• holding that knowledge of contents of a stolen jacket was not necessary to sustain conviction of theft of credit card which was located within a wallet in one of the jacket pockets
• holding that knowledge of contents of a stolen jacket was not necessary to sustain conviction of theft of credit card which was located within a wallet in one of the jacket pockets
• concluding that knowledge of the contents of a stolen jacket was not necessary to sustain conviction for theft of a credit card that was in a wallet in a pocket of the jacket
• concluding that knowledge of the contents of a stolen jacket was not necessary to sustain the conviction for theft of a credit card that was located within a wallet in one of the jacket pockets
• concluding that knowledge of the contents of a stolen jacket was not necessary to sustain the conviction for theft of a credit card that was located within a wallet in one of the jacket pockets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).