Skip to main content
· 5/11/1990

Sulkowski v. Sulkowski

Citations

  • 561 So. 2d 416
  • 1990 WL 60905

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the appellant's \unilateral misunderstanding of the requirement for a cash deposit\ as a legally sufficient mistake to set aside a judicial sale
  • The decision to set aside a judicial sale rests in the trial court's discretion, and the appellate court should not typically interfere with that decision.
  • trial court erred in setting aside judicial sale based on party's failure to acquaint herself with the requirements thereof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.