Sulima v. Tobyhanna Army Depot

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “side effects from medical treatment may themselves constitute an impairment under the ADA . . . .”
• recognizing that the ADA “contains a provision declaring that whether an impairment is substantially limiting must be judged without regard to the ameliorative effects of mitigating measures” (internal citations and quotations omitted)
• applying Mass. Gen. L. c. 260 § 2A to § 1983 claim
• listing factors relevant to determining whether an impairment is a disability
• “If an appeal is taken only from a specified judgment, the court does not acquire jurisdiction to 'r.eview other judgments not specified or ‘fairly inferred’ by the Notice.”
• “[B]ecause only a final judgment or order is appealable, the appeal from a final judgment draws in question all prior non-final orders and rulings.” (internal quotation and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).