Skip to main content
· 1/25/1967

Sulger v. Arizona Corporation Commission

Citations

  • 423 P.2d 145
  • 5 Ariz. App. 69
  • 1967 Ariz. App. LEXIS 356

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that notice of issues to be addressed at hearing must be “reasonabl[y] definite” because affected party “must know against what he must defend.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Donofrio, Cameron, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.