Suk Yong Kim v. Sumitomo Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim for breach of fiduciary duty could not be maintained because the Kims failed to alleged that the bank possessed so much control that it dominated them to the extent that they lost their separate identity, or that the bank became the Kims’ alter ego
• “the relationship of a bank-commercial borrower does not constitute a special relationship for the purposes of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing”
• “the relationship of a bank-commercial borrower does not constitute a special relationship for the purposes of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing”
• “[T]he relationship of a bank-commercial borrower does not constitute a special 19 relationship for the purposes of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).