Suiza Dairy, Corp v. Oficina Para La Reglamentacion De La

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that such a rent control ordinance \is a regulation of petitioners’ use of their property\ and not “an unwanted physical occupation of [the] property”
• holding that a taking is only effected “if the government authorizes a compelled invasion of property”
• holding that new “arguments” may be raised on appeal, so long as the “claim” they support was raised below
• concluding that a statute requiring that evictions be given with 6- or 12-months’ notice is not a compelled physical invasion in violation of the Takings Clause
• holding that a local rent control ordinance did not amount to a physical taking 21 because the government had not required any physical invasion of petitioners’ property
• noting that \we ordinarily do not consider questions outside those presented in the petition for certiorari\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).