Skip to main content
· 3/5/1951

Suits v. Chumley

Citations

  • 218 Ark. 488
  • 236 S.W.2d 1001
  • 1951 Ark. LEXIS 367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the privilege against self-incrimination is not implicated “by the choice granted by the Georgia Implied Consent Statute whether to submit to a chemical test of bodily substances such as blood, breath, or urine”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Millwee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.