Suhail Al Shimari v. CACI Premier Technology, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “There is . . . ‘a very strong presumption’ that if an appropriations act changes substantive law, it does so only for the fiscal year for which the bill was passed.” (quoting Bldg. & Constr. Trades Dep’t, AFL- 38 CIO v. Martin, 961 F.2d 269, 273 (D.C. Cir. 1992))
• “There is . . . ‘a very strong presumption’ that if an appropriations act changes substantive law, it does so only for the fiscal year for which the bill was passed.” (quoting Bldg. & Constr. Trades Dep’t, AFL- 38 CIO v. Martin, 961 F.2d 269, 273 (D.C. Cir. 1992))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).