Suggs v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• aceusation that trial court was “crooked,” had the record so reflected, is contemptuous because it serves to “degrade, embarrass or hinder the court in the performance of its judicial duties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Ippolito v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-07-03· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ex parte Earman
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1923-03-15· cited 77×
• Ex parte Biggers
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1923-03-15· cited 38×
• Krueger v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-08-02· cited 33×
• Scott v. Anderson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-10-14· cited 14×