Suggs v. McNeil

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that significant aggravating facts are “difficult to overcome” and holding that a state supreme court’s prejudice decision wasn’t unreasonable
• ex- plaining that significant aggravating facts are “difficult to over- come” and holding that a state supreme court’s prejudice decision wasn’t unreasonable
• “As we have repeatedly recognized, evidence of drug and alcohol use is often a two-edged sword that provides an independent basis for moral judgment by the jury.” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).