Sugg v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that counterclaimant failed to allege antitrust standing because it “does not allege price increases, competitor exits from the market, or anything else that could substantiate the injury necessary to have standing to sue under the antitrust laws”
• striking unclean hands defense to the extent it is based on a claim that is not the same as the conduct asserted in the Complaint
• declining to grant leave to effect proper service where “such service would be futile” because the claim would fail on the merits
• denying leave to effect proper service where the claim fails on the merits
• “[C]ourts have generally rejected the claim that a reference, if submitted to the PTO Examiner, can be buried for the purposes of establishing inequita- ble conduct.” (citing Fiskars, 221 F.3d at 1327)
• “New York Courts have consistently held that service of process on one corporation does not confer jurisdiction over another, even where one corporation may wholly own another, or where they may share the same principals.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).