Sugar Institute, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that steps taken to secure “adherence, without deviation, to the prices and terms ... announced” violate § 1 of the Sherman Act
• noting that “steps taken to secure adherence, without deviation, to prices and terms ... announced” violate § 1
• explaining that “steps . . . to secure adherence, without deviation, to prices and terms . . . announced” are illegal
• holding unlawful an agreement to adhere to previously announced prices and terms of sale even though the particular prices and terms were not themselves fixed by private agreement
• affirming district court's remedial decree requiring public dissemination of the information gathered
• “steps ... to secure adherence, without deviation, to prices and terms ... announced” are illegal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).