Suever v. Connell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Plaintiff 3 cannot recover more than the proceeds from the liquidation even 4 though the Unclaimed Property Fund is not comprised of state 5 funds
• noting that the Eleventh Amendment is no bar to the plaintiffs’ claims for return of their escheated principal “and the sales proceeds therefrom”
• barring recovery of “the amount of the difference between the proceeds of the sale of their unclaimed property and the current market value”
• rejecting a claim against the Controller for “the amount of the difference between the proceeds of the sale of [the plaintiffs’] unclaimed property and the current market value”
• holding the same for 18 declaratory relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).