· 2/9/1995
Suetrack USA v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
Citations
- 902 P.2d 854
- 19 Brief Times Rptr. 213
- 1995 Colo. App. LEXIS 30
- 1994 WL 752726
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Any regulation that is contrary to or inconsistent with the regulatory authorizing statute is void.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Plank, Ney, Ruland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.