Sudzus v. Department of Employment Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no unauthorized practice in appearing in unemployment proceeding where non-lawyer “supplied simple, fact-based answers”
• notwithstanding the legislature’s authorization for an agent to represent parties in unemployment insurance cases, only the supreme court has the authority to define and regulate the practice of law
• providing that the statement that damages to heating and air-conditioning units was $8,000 was not hearsay, where the statement was not offered to prove the actual amount of damages but was offered to show that the board had been alerted that there was damage to the units
• providing that the statement that damages to heating and air-conditioning units was $8,000 was not hearsay, where the statement was not offered to prove the actual amount of damages but was offered to show that the board had been alerted that there was damage to the units
• “a rule or policy need not be written down or otherwise formalized” to be reasonable under section 602(A)
• where sufficient competent evidence supports an administrative decision, the administration’s improper admission of hearsay does not constitute prejudicial error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).