Skip to main content
· 10/15/1932

Sudolsky v. Krantz

Citations

  • 236 A.D. 789

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “plaintiffs . . . cannot recover under a breach of contract action because they lack privity to enforce the benefit of the parties’ bargain.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.