Sudler v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding abuse of discretion where a trial court excused jurors and caused a mistrial based on juror’s unavailability the following Monday without making any further scheduling inquiries
• It is only “[w]here ‘the governmental conduct in question is intended to ‘goad’ the defendant 8 Recognizing no viable claim exists under Delaware’s current legal framework, Defendant proposes a novel theory and invites the Court to: (1
• It is only “[w]here ‘the governmental conduct in question is intended to ‘goad’ the defendant into moving for a mistrial ... [that] a defendant [can] raise the bar of double jeopardy to a second trial after having succeeded in aborting the first on his own motion.””
• It is only “[w]here ‘the governmental conduct in question is intended to ‘goad’ the defendant into moving for a mistrial ... [that] a defendant [can] raise the bar of double jeopardy to a second trial after having succeeded in aborting the first on his own motion.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).