· 3/22/2011
Suding v. State
Citations
- 945 N.E.2d 731
- 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 474
- 2011 WL 1002731
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that in light of the evidence of the defendant’s guilt, the prosecutor’s fleeting comment about the defendant’s criminal past did not constitute fundamental error
- trial court’s decision “is afforded great deference because the judge is in the best position to gauge the surrounding circumstances of an event and its impact on the jury”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: May
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.