Skip to main content
· 3/22/2011

Suding v. State

Citations

  • 945 N.E.2d 731
  • 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 474
  • 2011 WL 1002731

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that in light of the evidence of the defendant’s guilt, the prosecutor’s fleeting comment about the defendant’s criminal past did not constitute fundamental error
  • trial court’s decision “is afforded great deference because the judge is in the best position to gauge the surrounding circumstances of an event and its impact on the jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.