Sudduth v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a VI FLSA claim of an employee seeking unpaid wages from a former employer to be timely within the six-year statute of limitations
• “the substance of a motion, and not its caption, shall determine under which rule that motion is construed.” (quotation marks and citation omitted)
• “To the extent [the plaintiff] predicates his misrepresentation and fraud claims on [the defendant’s] statement that The Daily News is ‘the best small newspaper in America,’ such a statement is incontestably nonactionable puffery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).