Suddeth v. Knight

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the question of whether the defendants' actions created a nuisance where they blocked a water course causing ponding of water on the plaintiff's property was for the jury
• a stipulation will not be enforced if it is contradictory and confusing and there is a disagreement as to what was intended to be included therein
• it was peculiarly a question for the jury as to whether the flooding of plaintiffs property and its attendent problems was dangerous at all times and under all circumstances to life, health, or property
• it was peculiarly a question for the jury as to whether the flooding of plaintiff's property and its attendent problems was dangerous at all times and under all circumstances to life, health, or property
• “Stipulations will not be so construed as to give the effect of an admission of fact obviously intended to be controverted or the waiver of a right not plainly intended to be relinquished.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).