Suchite v. Kleppin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting summary judgment because plaintiff failed to present evidence that the real motivation was retaliation
• declining to apply Florida’s litigation privilege to an FLSA retaliation claim
• declining to apply Florida’s litigation privilege to an FLSA retaliation Claim
• noting the litigation privilege “does not bar abuse of process claims brought based upon actions taken outside the context of the judicial proceeding, such as actions taken before the litigation began or actions extrinsic to the litigation” (citation omitted)
• ‘The FLSA also protects former employees from retaliation by their former employers.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).