Succession of Welsh
Citations
- 111 La. 801
- 35 So. 913
- 64 L.R.A. 823
- 1904 La. LEXIS 563
Syllabus
<p>SALE—VENDOR’S PRIVILEGE—PAROL EVIDENCE.</p> <p>1.Where an order for goods is taken by a drummer in this state, subject to the approval of his principal, and is transmitted to the principal in another state, and is there approved and there filled by the segregation and shipment of the goods, the sale is a contract of the domicile of the vendor, and does not give rise to a vendor’s privilege on the goods, unless such privilege exists under the laws of such other state.</p> <p>2. Aliter, where the sale is consummated by the segregation of the goods from a stock of goods in this state.</p> <p>3. Where the order was in writing, it evidences the contract, and its terms cannot be varied or contradicted by parol.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is well established that a ‘weight of the evidence’ claim does not provide a basis for federal habeas relief”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nicholls, Provostn, Sick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.