Skip to main content
· 2/15/1868

Succession of Sutton

Citations

  • 20 La. 150

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that allegations of infringement satisfy the “acts of infringement” requirement (citation omitted)
  • stating that a plaintiff’s patent venue allegations may be contested
  • finding that an allegation that the infringer practiced one step of the infringing method in the district, even if the act was not tied or related to the infringer’s regular and established place of business in the district, can be enough to establish venue
  • “[T]here can be little doubt that the storage warehouses are places of business, even if the public never interacts with the warehouse.”
  • “[T]here can be little doubt that the storage warehouses are places of business, even if the public never interacts with the warehouse.”
  • “Google’s ownership of the server and its contents is absolute, as is its control over the server's location, once installed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Labauve

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.