Succession of Stone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• collecting factors from Fitzgerald Pub. Co., Inc. v. Baylor Pub. Co., Inc., 807 F.2d 1110, 1117 (2d Cir. 1986)
• dissolving Rule 62(a) stay based on showing that “defendants are likely to hide their assets”
• granting post-judgment interest where defendant’s assets were frozen before judgment and remained frozen after judgment
• awarding $50,000 per defendant for infringement of Plaintiff’s marks where the court could only determine that “each defendant sold at least one infringing product”
• noting trademark law has adopted a multi-factor analysis from copyright law for determining statutory damages
• allowing asset restraint to remain in place post-judgment under Lanham Act to “aid in the enforcement of the judgment” by preventing defendants from hiding assets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).