Succession of Shropshire

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that failure of staff judge advocate to serve addendum on defense when it relied on prior sentencing decision of the “seniormost military judge in the Pacific” was prejudicial error
• holding that failure of staff judge advocate to serve addendum on defense when it relied on prior sentencing decision of the “seniormost military judge in the Pacific” was prejudicial error
• SJA’s countering of defense clemency submissions with assertion that “senior most military judge in the Pacific” who adjudged sentence had already taken these matters into consideration was prejudicial error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).